There were always people on the history or on their dating loud to himself harbored doubts and it seems that many have very well might not be deceived, and their feeling may have been right.
If so, what American scientists have discovered that we could almost forget everything that has set before us the science to be correct and irrefutable.
As with other Dating has been demonstrated, eg the C 14 method is not really mature - although indicated by the scientists, they still apply as well and defended. If you remember:
There was even a case because scientists were transferred data and it should now be calculated based on the data, how old the material is. These scientists came to the conclusion that there must be an age of 12,000 years. However, they do not
knew that it was information of a living fly, which could hardly be so old. The entire article about it can be seen not only the C 14 method is in danger, but also medical methods must be called into question be. Accordingly, all are
Scientific research and the results that are obtained with appropriate methods must be called into question. which will appeal to not one or the other scientists, particularly I guess in the Archaeological Group depression, for example, if the age of the pyramids of Giza to be completely rethought to find out maybe that they are much older than assumed, or rather dated, were - with a completely inadequate and inaccurate method. And that's just because it has bridled the horse from behind and not only checked, whether actually has a measurement methodology is entirely correct.
Stanford / USA - Scientists in the U.S. have made an amazing discovery, and also confusing. The decay of some radioactive elements in laboratories around the world seems to be altered by activities inside the sun. This insight could serious impact on many scientific models, theories, methods and applications have, if it is found that the rate of decay of radioactive elements is not a constant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment